On Fri, 07 Jun 2002 16:10:43 +0700
James Clark <> wrote:
> Here is a list of some ideas I would want to consider for 2.0. Most of these
> are things that we considered for 1.0 but decided to leave out.
I suppose that RELAX NG 2.0 is a long-term goal. However, it might make sense
to introduce some small fixes before RELAX NG becomes an International Standard.
Your idea 10
> 10. A better restriction on <interleave> (issue 40); the current one forbids
> some useful things
and Hosoya-san's suggestion
> An infinite-nameclass <attribute> is required to have <text/>
> as its content.
are possibilities for such fixes.
I'm tempted by:
> 5. Mechanism to constrain mixed content, at least the character repertoire
> (issue 41).
--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <>