On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 09:11, Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
> When you say ugly, what do you mean: ugly to look at or ugly to implement or
> use?
>
> I thought of an alternative, less unattractive syntax for annotations (very
> late, I admit).
Probably naive, but why not simply include XML snippets?
> namespace a = "http://relaxng.org/ns/compatibility/annotations/1.0"
>
> a:annotation { "glip glop glorp" }
would become
<a:annotation>glip glop glorp</a:annotation>
Might be considered ugly, but at least people are used to this kind of
stuff by now :-)
Eric
--
See you in San Diego.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
