Re: [relax-ng] Conversion of comments between the compact and the XMLsyntax

On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 02:50, James Clark wrote:
> > It seems to me that the annotation should be included in what is
> > described (especially if you want to extract documentation) and that if
> > I want to document a complex regular expression within a pattern, the
> > annotation should be included in the "pattern" element rather than
> > following it.
> 
> Why?  The spec (DTD Compatibility) explicitly allows a:documentation to 
> follow the RELAX NG element to which it applies.  This done precisely to 
> allow annotation of param/value/name.

I had missed that point. That's not really intuitive, but I guess that
this can work!

Thanks

Eric
> 
> James
-- 
Freelance consulting and training.
                                            http://dyomedea.com/english/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------