Re: [relax-ng] (Minor) inconstency between XML and compact syntaxes

On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 12:37, James Clark wrote:

> The reason why the latter is forbidden is that there's a tendency to use it
> assuming it means
> 
> <start>
>   <choice>
>     <ref name="foo"/>
>     <ref name="bar"/>
>   </choice>
> </start>

Makes sense. I must be biased by my implementation is which "start" is
implemented as a sub class of "define" to have missed this :-) .

Thanks

Eric
-- 
Did you know it? Python has now a Relax NG (partial) implementation.
                                          http://advogato.org/proj/xvif/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------