RE: [relax-ng] Which mode should we choose?

From
David RR Webber \(XML\) <>
Date
2006-11-03T15:11:55+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [relax-ng] Which mode should we choose?
Murata,

 

We will also need to change our charter first.

 

We need explicitly add a section on IPR - my suggest is that we state
that we do not accept contributions to the work that have associated IPR
and hence are not public and open.

 

Our current charter also needs updating on dates and deliverables -
see charter next below.

 

Thanks, DW

======================================================

 

RELAX NG

Statement of Purpose

The purpose is to create a specification for a schema language for
XML based on the TREX proposal (http://www.thaiopensource.com/trex/).
The key features of TREX are that it:

is simple 

is easy to learn 

uses XML syntax 

does not change the information set of an XML document 

supports XML namespaces 

treats attributes uniformly with elements so far as possible 

has unrestricted support for unordered content 

has unrestricted support for mixed content 

has a solid theoretical basis 

can partner with a separate datatyping language (such W3C XML Schema
Datatypes) 

List of Deliverables

The deliverable is a specification for the language. The projected
date for the first Committee Specification is 1 July 2001.

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[relax-ng] Which mode should we choose?
From: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY
Given)" <>
Date: Fri, November 03, 2006
10:05 am
To: 

Dear members of the
RELAX NG TC,

We have to choose one of the modes unless we want to
close this 
TC.  "RF on Limited Terms" sounds the most
approproate for us.  Any 
ideas?

After we choose one of
the modes, we will start a transition request
ballot.  In my
understanding, an e-mail ballot is good enough.  After 
that, I
will ask Mary McRae to conduct the rest of the
transition.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
<>