Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion

From
DuCharme, Bob (LNG) <>
Date
2002-07-17T16:47:13+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion
Title: RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion

Got 
it, thanks. I figured out that it's actually slightly different (no final "s" in 
"subcommittees"):

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/rights/documents/subcommittee/spec/cr/

 

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: DeMartini, Thomas 
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 
2002 11:49 AM
To: 'DuCharme, Bob (LNG) '; DeMartini, Thomas; 
''' '
Subject: RE: 
[rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion

Sure, you can take a crack at it.  The template can be 
found at 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/rights/documents/subcommittees/spec/cr 

The file cr.dot is the template.  The cmp.doc file may help 
to answer any questions if anything in the template is unclear.

Thanks, 
Thomas. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: 
DuCharme, Bob (LNG) 
To: 'DeMartini, Thomas'; 
'' 
Sent: 7/17/2002 
6:57 AM 
Subject: RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case 
discussion 

>[TD] Yes, the latter: something I'm suggesting may be worth 
requesting 
in the spec. 
  
Do you want to fill out the CR or should I 
take a crack at it, and if 
the latter, is there a 
template to use? 
  
thanks, 
  
Bob 

  
-----Original 
Message----- 
From: DeMartini, Thomas [mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:48 PM 
To: 'DuCharme, Bob (LNG)'; DeMartini, Thomas; 
'' 
Subject: 
RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion 

responses below after [TD]. 

thanks, 
thomas. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: 
DuCharme, Bob (LNG) [ mailto: 

<mailto:> 
] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:06 PM 
To: 'DeMartini, Thomas'; '' 

Subject: RE: [rights-examples] ln00x use case discussion 

>                
<proposed:principalClass> 
>                        
http://www.foo.com/platinumMember 
<http://www.foo.com/platinumMember>  
>                
</proposed:principalClass> 

Does the "proposed" namespace prefix reference a namespace that 
I'd have 
to make up, or does it already exist, or as I'm 
guessing from its name, 
is it something that you're 
suggesting may be worth requesting in the 
spec to 
address this issue? 

[TD] Yes, the latter: something I'm suggesting may be worth 
requesting 
in the spec.
Next in thread → Next in month →