On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:45:02 -0500, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
> > The problem (for me, at least) stems from the phrase "any artifact" in
> > the opening line of the quote. Since artifacts of type 0x0001--0x0003
> > do not have an EndpointIndex, they do not qualify as "any artifact" as
> > defined in SAML2. So what is the "status" of these older artifact
> > formats? (Surely, a SAML2 implementation can take advantage of them
> > since indexed endpoints have defaults.)
>
> No. SAML 1.x artifacts have no place in SAML 2.0 whatsoever. Different
> semantics entirely.
Other than EndpointIndex, what is the difference?
Cheers,
Tom
