Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [saml-dev] Consent in the RequestAbstractType.

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2006-09-19T15:28:33+00:00
ID
001701c6dc00$403a9690$
Thread
RE: [saml-dev] Consent in the RequestAbstractType.
> Looking at the identifiers,
> I guess implicit is the case when there is not a tick box but 
> may be a Warning message for example, but I don't quite 
> understand the difference between explicit and obtained, 
> aren't they the same ?

No, obtained just means that at some point consent was understood to have
happened. Explicit means you asked at that point in time.

> Also I guess from a SAML point of view (a part the fact that 
> a Request SHOULD be Signed in case there is a consent 
> attribute) the behavior at the IDP is out of scope.

Yep.

-- Scott
Next in thread → Next in month →