Re: [saml-dev] empty assertions

On 10/27/06, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
> > The only thing I can think of is an empty assertion wrapper
> > for Advice elements.
>
> Advice elements mean "here's information in support of the assertion's
> content". That wouldn't make any sense, basically.

Well, I guess that would depend on the specific use case.  Btw, I may
have asked this before, but does anyone know of a use case for the
Advice element?

Thanks,
Tom