RE: [saml-dev] Load balancing with SAML2

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2008-04-17T14:31:22+00:00
ID
014b01c8a096$d3290ac0$797b2040$@
Thread
RE: [saml-dev] Load balancing with SAML2
> Does anybody have already think about this kind of problem ?

That's an implementation issue. It depends entirely on how the SP chooses to
maintain state, if any (e.g. cookies).

I don't think turning the responses into unsolicited ones is really a
solution to the general problem.

-- Scott