RE: [saml-dev] multiple attributes

Yes, that's true. The recommendation should be to be conservative/safe in what you'll emit and robust in what you'll consume.

Ari


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cantor [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:58 AM
> To: ; 
> Cc: ; 
> Subject: RE: [saml-dev] multiple attributes
> 
> 
> > There may be implementations that process each attribute very
> independently
> > and the second occurrence may simply overwrite the first.  
> Using a single
> > multi-valued attribute makes it quite clear that the 
> attribute has two
> > values associated with it at the same time.
> 
> I think the point of Tom's question is that in fact such 
> implementations are
> broken and should be fixed. The spec doesn't allow that assumption.
> 
> It's fine to say that the safe approach is to use multiple 
> values, but let's
> not lose sight of the important part.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
>