Re: [saml-dev] Clarification of consent in SAMLv2.0

On 2/23/11 7:42 AM, "Anil John" <> wrote:
>This potentially solves a problem for me a well.  On a related note,
>does SAML 2 Metadata provide any mechanism, either directly or via an
>extensibility point, for a SAML IdP or Attribute Service to
>"advertise" the Consent URI values it requires and or supports?

Nope. As I said, it was a very minimally defined field, inherited from
ID-FF. We used to call it the "lawyer" bit.

-- Scott