Re: [saml-dev] Clarification on SAML2 "Time Values"

* Dieter Maurer <> [2014-09-23 09:05]:
> Should section 1.3.3 be interpreted as
> "MUST be expressed in the canonical "dateTime" representation
> (section 3.2.7.2 of [Schema2]) for timezoned values
> (i.e. expressed in UTC with "Z" as time zone component)."
> or is the "Z" suffix in the example wrong?

See this similar question to this list from a year ago:
http://markmail.org/thread/yqyjmtdqm4x3cgdr
-peter