Having only one saves time and has no harm.
- adam
Thomas Wisniewski wrote:
> No, I meant one (sp and idp share the same one).
>
> Tom.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Ciochon, Robert [mailto:]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2005 4:10 PM
> *To:* Thomas Wisniewski; samldemotech
> *Subject:* RE: RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
> 26, 2005
>
> I assumed so, one for the SP and one for the idP. Any other opinions?
> Bob
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Thomas Wisniewski [mailto:]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 28, 2005 12:31 PM
> *To:* samldemotech
> *Subject:* RE: RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
> 26, 2005
>
> Bob, will each vendor use the same cert for signatures (i.e., same
> one for SP or IDP)? Seems reasonable (and less confusing) to have
> only one.
>
> Thanks, Tom.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Ciochon, Robert [mailto:]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:59 PM
> *To:* samldemotech
> *Subject:* RSA SAML Interop Conference Call Minutes - January
> 26, 2005
>
> <<rsademotech-minutes-2005-01-26.doc>>
>
> *Robert Ciochon*
> eTrust Development Manager
> Computer Associates
> San Diego, California
> (858) 625-6866
>
>
