RE: [sarif] run.invocation => run.invocations

This is fine, it would be a bug to leave the name in a singular form after converting it is an array.

 

From:  <>
On Behalf Of Larry Golding (Comcast)

Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:31 PM

To: 

Subject: [sarif] run.invocation => run.invocations

 

Now that run.invocation is an array of
invocation objects, I would like to change the name of the property to
run.invocations. Otherwise, it would be the only array-valued property in the specification with a singular name.

 

Please let me know if there’s any objection. David, please let me know if you think this needs to be explicitly approved at the next TC.

 

Thanks,

Larry