RE: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design

From
Laurence Golding
Date
2019-04-29T19:59:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design
I approve this message! Much better than my solution.
From:
Michael Fanning <>

  Sent:  Monday, April 29, 2019 12:56 PM
To:  James Kupsch <>; Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) <>; OASIS SARIF TC Discussion List <>
Subject:  RE: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design



Here s my suggestion:



For address.length, use a sentinel value of  0  meaning  not provided . This makes sense, as Jim noted, a 0 length memory address isn t sensible. You don t posit describing an insertion point in memory that
  shoves everything to the right.