Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset- Updated Proposal

Dave,

Many thanks for the review

Updated proposal here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31877/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue117a.pdf

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31876/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue117a.doc

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

From:
David Booz <>

To:


Date:
31/03/2009 14:54

Subject:
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition
of compatible superset and subset - Updated Proposal

Some comments based on a search of the proposal document
for the word compatible:

line 1259: I think this is ok as it is.

Agreed

line 1757, 1767: I think these should say compatible superset

Agreed

line 1885: This is a bit awkward because ASM60022 uses the new "compatible
interface" term and then re-defines the term in ASM60023. It might
be more clear to rework ASM60022 to use the term compatible superset, then
we could get rid of ASM60022.

Agreed - see if you like my new wording

line 2603: seems ok as it is

OK

line 2607 and 2614: should be compatible superset as per ASM50004 on line
741.

Hmm - a bit messy.  See if you like
my new approach here.

line 2618 needs to be updated to point to section 7.2.

Good catch

line 2504: Is there a reason why #5 is not combined with #3 on line 2499?

Yes - see what happens for superset and
subset

I intended the 3 cases to run parallel to
each other...

---------------

As as aside, line 1035 talks about property type compatibility, which might
need some work? If you agree, I'll open a new issue.

Yep, that's a new issue  :-(

thanks

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

e-mail:

Mike
Edwards ---03/31/2009 08:47:08 AM---Folks, Here is an updated proposal
in the form of a change marked version built

From:

Mike Edwards <>

To:

"OASIS Assembly" <>

Date:

03/31/2009 08:47 AM

Subject:

[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset
- Updated Proposal

Folks, 

Here is an updated proposal in the form of a change marked version built
from CD03. 

This proposal creates formal definitions of Compatible interfaces, Compatible
superset interface 

and Compatible subset interfaces. It then adjusts relevant parts of the
specification to use those 

terms. 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31875/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%20Issue117.pdf

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31874/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%20Issue117.doc

I note that this proposal also resolves Issue 116 since it defines how
interfaces are compared. 

Yours, Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 

Email: 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU