RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution

From
Martin Chapman <>
Date
2009-06-24T16:42:01+00:00
ID
003701c9f4ea$a6ad0010$f4070030$@
Thread
RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution
With a strict chair hat on, we really need to look at the
broader schedule here.

In order to progress to Committee Specification we need  at
least two implementations passing the tests and showing some kind of interop.

As a Chair I have no idea when two implementations will surface
to meet this criteria.

 

If they surface soon I share the schedule concerns expressed by
others.

If two implementations are not on the near horizon, then I see
no problem in discussing resolutions to issue-80.

 

Martin.

 

From: Mike Edwards
[mailto:] 

Sent: 23 June 2009 10:13

To: OASIS Assembly

Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution

 

Anish, 

Thank you for
your proposal. 

Can I ask for
your assessment on the likely impact of this approach to the schedule of
completion of the 

OASIS SCA
Assembly Model specification V1.1 and also for your assessment of the likely
impact to the 

schedules of
the other affected specifications? 

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:   

 

  
  
From: 

  
  
  
Anish
  Karmarkar <> 

  
 

 

  
  
To: 

  
  
  
OASIS
  Assembly <> 

  
 

 

  
  
Date: 

  
  
  
22/06/2009
  18:52 

  
 

 

  
  
Subject: 

  
  
  
[sca-assembly]
  [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution

  
 

 

I would like to propose that we use the
contribution at [2], as a basis

for a directional resolution for issue 80 [1]. Specifically, we

introduce the concepts of events, event types, producers, consumers,

channels; and the changes these concepts make to the existing

composite/component/componentType/constrainingType constructs.

If this directional resolution is accepted, I suggest that an inlined

document (with change marks) be produced that provides a merge between

[2] and the existing latest version of SCA Assembly. This would then

serve as a basis for the resolution of issue 80.

Comments?

-Anish

--

[1] http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-80

[2]

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/32379/SCA_Assembly_Extensions_for_Event_Processing_and_PubSub_V1_0.pdf

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

 

Unless
stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU