Re: [sca-assembly] Another conformance test question

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2009-12-14T09:23:18+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-assembly] Another conformance test question
Jim,

The reason that the contribution names
are passed in this way is that the computation of the URLs for the

contributions is handled generically
in the base test class.  

At the moment, the runtime specific
code does not have to handle the properties file that allows things to

be configured.  I suppose this
could be changed but I don't see any particular advantage.

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

From:
Jim Marino <>

To:
OASIS Assembly <>

Date:
13/12/2009 21:29

Subject:
[sca-assembly] Another conformance test
question

Sorry for sending these comments piecemeal...

Why are contribution names passed to:

RuntimeBridge.startContribution(String contributionLocation,    

String[] contributionNames)

when they appear to be the same as those set in:

RuntimeBridge.setTestConfiguration(TestConfiguration testConfiguration)?

Assuming they are the same,  I think it would be clearer to pass an
 

immutable object to the startContribution method such as:

RuntimeBridge.startContribution(TestConfiguration configuration)

Jim

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU