| 1 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
285 |
Sep 2007 |
| 2 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
189 |
Feb 2009 |
| 3 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
33 |
Feb 2009 |
| 4 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
23 |
Feb 2009 |
| 5 |
REOPEN ISSUES 132 and 149: Update to Sanjay's Proposal |
22 |
Apr 2010 |
| 6 |
Groups - Event "SCA Assembly Conference Call" modified |
22 |
Nov 2011 |
| 7 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 253]: (1.2) Must a global domain channelbe deployed before it can be used? |
20 |
Feb 2011 |
| 8 |
Action item 2010-12-07-3, ASSEMBLY-239 |
16 |
Dec 2010 |
| 9 |
[Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
15 |
Jun 2009 |
| 10 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call cancelled |
13 |
Nov 2007 |
| 11 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Conference Call modified |
13 |
Apr 2011 |
| 12 |
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F meeting modified |
12 |
Sep 2007 |
| 13 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 116: Interface compatibility refers to input/outputtypes which is ambiguous when using WSDL 1.1 |
12 |
Mar 2009 |
| 14 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Misadventures exploring "@coupledTo" for proposedresolution of ASSEMBLY-227 |
12 |
Dec 2010 |
| 15 |
Groups - CD03 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.pdf) uploaded |
11 |
Mar 2009 |
| 16 |
A New SCA Testing TC? |
11 |
Jul 2009 |
| 17 |
Private or local channels |
11 |
Feb 2011 |
| 18 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
9 |
Feb 2009 |
| 19 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
9 |
May 2009 |
| 20 |
Conformace point highlight color |
9 |
Jun 2009 |
| 21 |
Looking for feedback on "injecting of channels" |
9 |
Oct 2010 |
| 22 |
[Issue 251] Some early thoughts |
9 |
Dec 2010 |
| 23 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 253]: (1.2) Must a global domain channel bedeployed before it can be used? |
9 |
Feb 2011 |
| 24 |
SCA Visual Modeling "Standard?" |
8 |
Sep 2007 |
| 25 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 6 - alternate proposal - Version 2 ! |
8 |
Nov 2007 |
| 26 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Wiring from a reference with no binding to aservice with a binding |
8 |
Nov 2007 |
| 27 |
Groups - SCA Assembly TC F2F meeting modified |
8 |
Jan 2008 |
| 28 |
XSDs for Main SCA Namespace - Updated Namespace |
8 |
Mar 2009 |
| 29 |
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect usage of MAY Keyword |
8 |
Mar 2009 |
| 30 |
LOA request |
8 |
Jun 2010 |
| 31 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Need some notion of "callback" addressin conjunction with eventing |
8 |
Oct 2010 |
| 32 |
Summarizing the state of ASSEMBLY-235 |
8 |
Dec 2010 |
| 33 |
SCA-Assembly TC Contribution |
7 |
Sep 2007 |
| 34 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Wiring from a reference with no binding to a service with a binding |
7 |
Nov 2007 |
| 35 |
Fw: [chairs] OASIS Issues Tracking System |
7 |
Nov 2008 |
| 36 |
Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
7 |
Feb 2009 |
| 37 |
Re: [sca-assembly] REOPEN ISSUES 132 and 149: Update to Sanjay'sProposal |
7 |
Apr 2010 |
| 38 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 56: Need to clarify definition of BidirectionalInterfaces - Additional Discussion |
6 |
Jul 2008 |
| 39 |
[ISSUE 33] Updated Proposal for Issue 33 |
6 |
Nov 2008 |
| 40 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section - Comments on Proposal |
6 |
Mar 2009 |
| 41 |
Groups - CD03 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.doc) uploaded |
6 |
Mar 2009 |
| 42 |
SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document |
6 |
May 2009 |
| 43 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
6 |
May 2009 |
| 44 |
Re: [sca-assembly] A look at use-cases for composition with eventing,alternate approaches to make them work better |
6 |
Aug 2010 |
| 45 |
Concrete Exit Criteria for the SCA Assembly TC - Proposal |
6 |
Feb 2011 |
| 46 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Concrete Exit Criteria for the SCA Assembly TC- Proposal |
6 |
Feb 2011 |
| 47 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 41: Conflicting domain-level <wire> deployments -Proposed Resolution. |
5 |
Aug 2008 |
| 48 |
*** SCA Testing *** |
5 |
Nov 2008 |
| 49 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Additional Con Call modified |
5 |
Mar 2009 |
| 50 |
Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review |
5 |
Jun 2009 |
| 51 |
F2F attendance, please |
5 |
Nov 2009 |
| 52 |
TIBCO eventing proposal |
5 |
Nov 2009 |
| 53 |
Runtime-specific artifacts in conformance tests |
5 |
Dec 2009 |
| 54 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Concrete Exit Criteria for the SCA Assembly TC -Proposal |
5 |
Feb 2011 |
| 55 |
ISSUE 26: SCA Composite Visibility |
4 |
Nov 2007 |
| 56 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 6 - alternate proposal - Version 2 updated |
4 |
Nov 2007 |
| 57 |
Re: [sca-assembly] CD 01 revision 1 available and status of issueresolutions |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 58 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8 - Artifact resolution - proposal V5 |
4 |
Aug 2008 |
| 59 |
Complete Conformance version of Assembly Specification |
4 |
Oct 2008 |
| 60 |
ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assembly spec |
4 |
Feb 2009 |
| 61 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.pdf) uploaded |
4 |
Feb 2009 |
| 62 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Interface compatibility refers to input/outputtypes which is ambiguous when using WSDL 1.1 |
4 |
Mar 2009 |
| 63 |
Schedule of review for documents submitted for Public Review |
4 |
Mar 2009 |
| 64 |
Slides for SCA Assembly? |
4 |
May 2009 |
| 65 |
Normative language for conformance testing requirement |
4 |
Jun 2009 |
| 66 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
4 |
Jun 2009 |
| 67 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
4 |
Jun 2009 |
| 68 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] NEW ISSUE: (1.2) Promotionof consumers and producers undermines composability |
4 |
Apr 2010 |
| 69 |
Groups - CD06 - Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd06.doc) uploaded |
4 |
Aug 2010 |
| 70 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: [ASSEMBLY-249]: Need some notion of "callback"address in conjunction with eventing |
4 |
Nov 2010 |
| 71 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: [ASSEMBLY-249]: Need some notion of "callback" addressin conjunction with eventing |
4 |
Nov 2010 |
| 72 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Action item: 01-18-2: Distinction between globaland local channels |
4 |
Jan 2011 |
| 73 |
Draft minutes from 2011-01-25 have been posted |
4 |
Jan 2011 |
| 74 |
Exit Criteria Incomplete |
4 |
Jun 2011 |
| 75 |
Groups - Event "Scheduled SCA Assembly Conf Call" modified |
4 |
Jun 2012 |
| 76 |
Unapproved Conformance Guidelines |
3 |
Nov 2007 |
| 77 |
ISSUE 24: textual sca:include not sufficient |
3 |
Nov 2007 |
| 78 |
ISSUE 47:Operation element for Interface |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 79 |
NEW ISSUE: Do we need appendix A (pseudo-schema)? |
3 |
Jul 2008 |
| 80 |
Request for LOA |
3 |
Oct 2008 |
| 81 |
Re: [ASSEMBLY-88] Proposal discussion |
3 |
Nov 2008 |
| 82 |
Re: [sca-assembly] CamelCase convention recommendation from OpenCSAliaison committee |
3 |
Nov 2008 |
| 83 |
NEW ISSUE: RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 |
3 |
Feb 2009 |
| 84 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc) uploaded |
3 |
Feb 2009 |
| 85 |
ASSEMBLY-109: Proposed resolution |
3 |
Feb 2009 |
| 86 |
Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section |
3 |
Feb 2009 |
| 87 |
DST changes in the US on March 8 |
3 |
Feb 2009 |
| 88 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section - Commentson Proposal |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 89 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section -Comments on Proposal |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 90 |
Groups - CD02 Rev8 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev8.doc) uploaded |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 91 |
Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.zip uploaded |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 92 |
CD 03 zip file uploaded |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 93 |
Issue 123 |
3 |
Mar 2009 |
| 94 |
[ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - Revised Proposal, Part 1 |
3 |
May 2009 |
| 95 |
Re: reviewing ASM test assertions and testcases |
3 |
May 2009 |
| 96 |
SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
3 |
Jun 2009 |
| 97 |
Administrative Roster Repairs |
3 |
Jul 2009 |
| 98 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..nand targetsshould default to 0..n - Updated Proposal |
3 |
Jul 2009 |
| 99 |
Issue 132: Proposal |
3 |
Oct 2009 |
| 100 |
Groups - Wednesday Session of SCA Assembly TC Call modified |
3 |
Nov 2009 |
| 101 |
f2f hosting confirmed |
3 |
Nov 2009 |
| 102 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Problems with Assembly ASM_40xx, ASM_50xxASM_60xx and ASM_80xx testcases |
3 |
Nov 2009 |
| 103 |
Groups - Issue 189 - Proposal Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev6+Issue189.doc) uploaded |
3 |
Dec 2009 |
| 104 |
Groups - Issue 189 - Proposal PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev6+Issue189.pdf) uploaded |
3 |
Dec 2009 |
| 105 |
Another conformance test question |
3 |
Dec 2009 |
| 106 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY-225] Concept Definition Needed for "Runtime"in Appendix B - Proposal |
3 |
Apr 2010 |
| 107 |
waiting on updated namespace document from Assembly TC |
3 |
Jun 2010 |
| 108 |
Groups - PR 02 Package for Test Assertions (sca-assembly-1.1-test-assertions-cd02-package.zip) uploaded |
3 |
Jun 2010 |
| 109 |
Groups - PR 02 Package for TestCases (sca-assembly-1.1-testcases-cd02-package.zip) uploaded |
3 |
Jun 2010 |
| 110 |
requests for Public Review |
3 |
Aug 2010 |
| 111 |
draft minutes of 2010-08-03 are attached |
3 |
Aug 2010 |
| 112 |
Req LOA 8/17, 8/24 |
3 |
Aug 2010 |
| 113 |
Groups - Testsuite Adaptation - CD01 Package (TestSuite_Adaptation_Doc_CD01_Package.zip) uploaded |
3 |
Aug 2010 |
| 114 |
Re: [sca-assembly] A look at use-cases for composition with eventing, alternateapproaches to make them work better |
3 |
Aug 2010 |
| 115 |
Fwd: Slides for issue 233 |
3 |
Sep 2010 |
| 116 |
Question on eventing and transaction |
3 |
Oct 2010 |
| 117 |
NEW ISSUE (v1.1): SCA Runtime Conformance Language & NormativeReferences |
3 |
Nov 2010 |
| 118 |
Re: [sca-assembly] attempt at thread summary: looking for feedbackon "injecting of channels" |
3 |
Nov 2010 |
| 119 |
Minor typo: 1.2 WD 3 - line 2787 |
3 |
Jan 2011 |
| 120 |
issue 243: is default channel configurable? Proposals |
3 |
Nov 2011 |
| 121 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call added |
2 |
Sep 2007 |
| 122 |
Conf call reached capacity |
2 |
Sep 2007 |
| 123 |
Issue 5: Long-Running Request-Response Operations |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 124 |
Draft Minutes 2007-11-06 are attached |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 125 |
RE: [sca-bpel] Issue 12: Long-Running Request-Response Operations |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 126 |
ISSUE 15: Unclear how Composites are discovered when Referenced |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 127 |
ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 128 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 6 - alternate proposal - Version 2 final tweaks |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 129 |
Draft minutes of 2007-11-27 are attached |
2 |
Nov 2007 |
| 130 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 8 (was: Issue 17 proposal) |
2 |
Feb 2008 |
| 131 |
Issue 37 proposal |
2 |
May 2008 |
| 132 |
ISSUE 53: Contribution Extension Model |
2 |
May 2008 |
| 133 |
CD 01 review observations. |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 134 |
ISSUE 53: Contribution Extension Model - take 2 |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 135 |
CD 01 revision 1 available and status of issue resolutions |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 136 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 56: Need to clarify definition of BidirectionalInterfaces - Proposal text |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 137 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 16: Component URI is not well described ---Proposal for Aliases |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 138 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 8 proposal |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 139 |
Agenda for SCA Assembly TC Call, 8th July 2008 |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 140 |
Agenda for SCA Assembly TC Call, 22nd July 2008 |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 141 |
[NEW ISSUE]: Section on "Wire" in Appendix is Incorrect |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 142 |
Swapping F2F Dates |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 143 |
SCA schedule |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 144 |
Logistics, Sept 30-Oct 1 SCA-Assy F2f and Oct 2-3 SCA-Policy F2F |
2 |
Aug 2008 |
| 145 |
[ISSUE 51] Composite Completeness - Updated proposal |
2 |
Oct 2008 |
| 146 |
Issue 36: resolution proposal |
2 |
Oct 2008 |
| 147 |
[NEW ISSUE] Need Assembly level definition for "AllowsPassByReference" |
2 |
Nov 2008 |
| 148 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 95] "wiredByImpl" is an invalid attributefor a Composite Reference |
2 |
Nov 2008 |
| 149 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM13001 is incomplete. |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 150 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assemblyspec |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 151 |
ISSUE 108: ASM13001 is Incomplete |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 152 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 153 |
Review comments of sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.doc |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 154 |
Groups - Issue 107 Proposal Rev2 - Word (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4+Issue107.doc) uploaded |
2 |
Feb 2009 |
| 155 |
Draft Minutes of 2009-03-02 are attached |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 156 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section - Comment/Corrections for latest Proposal (V3) |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 157 |
[ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset - Updated Proposal |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 158 |
Groups - CD02 Rev7 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev7.doc) uploaded |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 159 |
Some comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev7.doc |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 160 |
Groups - CD02 Rev8 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev8.pdf) uploaded |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 161 |
NEW ISSUE: Conformance to OPTIONAL Normative Statements |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 162 |
Inconsistent use of ##other vs. ##any |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 163 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 117] Definition of compatible superset and subset- Updated Proposal |
2 |
Mar 2009 |
| 164 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword- Revised Proposal, Part 1 |
2 |
May 2009 |
| 165 |
Eventing spec |
2 |
May 2009 |
| 166 |
Test Assertions and TestCases that require Java |
2 |
May 2009 |
| 167 |
[NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment -when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
2 |
May 2009 |
| 168 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section6 |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 169 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM50007 has a typo in it. |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 170 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM50030 and ASM50031 (CD03) are duplicates |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 171 |
NEW ISSUE: Unmarked MUST on line 1030 (CD03) |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 172 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM60008 and ASM60013 are contradictory |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 173 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section7-10 |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 174 |
Two schema issues with SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 175 |
Comment on the status of work in the Assembly TC |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 176 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (c) |
2 |
Jun 2009 |
| 177 |
Improving conformance testing modularity |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 178 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (c) |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 179 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (d) |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 180 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (d) |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 181 |
Interesting PR comment |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 182 |
Updates to SCA schema and RDDL file |
2 |
Jul 2009 |
| 183 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 149] Resolution status - and a Directional Proposal |
2 |
Oct 2009 |
| 184 |
Groups - 200903-EJBbindingupdate.htm uploaded |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 185 |
[NEW ISSUE] Testcase ASM_12011 is missing a Contribution |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 186 |
Groups - SCA Assembly TC F2F Meeting added |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 187 |
Comments on TIBCO SCA Event Processing Proposal |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 188 |
Groups - Wednesday Session of SCA Assembly TC Call cancelled |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 189 |
contact info for the F2F |
2 |
Nov 2009 |
| 190 |
Groups - CD04 - Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd04.doc) uploaded |
2 |
Dec 2009 |
| 191 |
Groups - CD04 - PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd04.pdf) uploaded |
2 |
Dec 2009 |
| 192 |
Groups - CD04 - PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd04.pdf) modified |
2 |
Dec 2009 |
| 193 |
Concerns raised by Siemens |
2 |
Dec 2009 |
| 194 |
Filing issues against the conformance tests |
2 |
Dec 2009 |
| 195 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY-221] Missing normative statement for property/@file- Updated Proposal |
2 |
Apr 2010 |
| 196 |
[ASSEMBLY-224] Compliance test composites need multiplicity attributeupdates - Proposal |
2 |
Apr 2010 |
| 197 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY-225] Concept Definition Needed for "Runtime" inAppendix B - Proposal |
2 |
Apr 2010 |
| 198 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] NEW ISSUE: (1.2) Promotion of consumers andproducers undermines composability |
2 |
Apr 2010 |
| 199 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-227 - Promotion of consumers and producersundermines composability |
2 |
Apr 2010 |
| 200 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY-206] Test 5032 and 5034 uses runtime-specificURIs - PROPOSAL |
2 |
May 2010 |
