Michael Rowley wrote:
The latest
draft of the spec, in PDF, has
lines 82 and 83, which seem to be what we are talking about (not lines
53 and
54).
/binding.ws/@wsdlElement
– optional
attribute that specifies the URI of a WSDL element. The use of this
attribute
indicates that the SCA binding points to the specified element in an
existing
WSDL document. The URI can have the following forms:
...
o Binding:
<WSDL-namespace-URI>#wsdl.binding(<binding-name>)
In this case, the
identified WSDL binding must have an equivalent PortType with the SCA
service
or reference. In this case the endpoint address URI for the SCA service
or
reference must be provided via the URI attribute on the binding.
I
One final
note, I think the first sentence
should replace the “equivalent” with “conforming”.
This strikes me as a separate issue, for sure, and possibly worth
filing? I'm not quite comfortable with your particular word choice,
because "conforming" isn't used anywhere else. Perhaps, if we were to
define it, and use it everywhere, that would make sense, but as it is,
the other three bullet points in this section use the "equivalent"
construct. I also note that we aim to be inclusive of WSDL 2.0, but
here only refer to PortTypes, and don't mention interfaces.
-Eric.
