← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
NEW ISSUE: JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly
Title: JMS binding pseudo-schemas inconsistent with assembly Target: binding.jms Description: The current pseudo-schema definition for binding.jms includes "string" types for attributes that have a fixed set of values, with those values being enumerated in the definition of the attribute. In assembly, the approach that is taken is to enumerate those values in the pseudo-schema, so for example binding.jms currently has: <binding.jms correlationScheme=”string”? Whereas assembly uses the following: multiplicity="0..1 or 1..1 or 0..n or 1..n"? Proposal: Update the pesudo-schema in binding.jms to enumerate options explicitly in the pseudo-schema. Replace definition of correlationScheme attribute by: correlationScheme=”RequestMsgIDToCorrelID or RequestCorrelIDToCorrelID or None” Replace definition of create attribute throughout by: create=”always or never or ifnotexist” Replace definition of JMSDeliveryMode attribute throughout by: JMSDeliveryMode=”PERSISTENT or NON_PERSISTENT” Replace definition of JMSPriority attribute throughout by: JMSPriority=”0 .. 9” Simon Holdsworth STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 Internet - Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread