Hi David,
David Booz wrote:
I may have missed some discussion. I was surprised to see this:
"This specification only defines a binding using
WSDL 1.1, but does not prohibit a future specification defining a
binding for WSDL 2.0."
I was expecting to see this:
This specification only defines a binding using
WSDL 1.1, but does not prohibit a vendor from extending the binding to
support WSDL 2.0.
The first statement doesn't really say anything since future specs are
free to change whatever they want anyway. I would have thought that the
important point to address was around concerns that the binding was
limited to 1.1 in the presence of a WSDL 2.0 spec, and therefore we
need to leave the door open for vendors to go there if they want to.
The way I read the first statement is that we expect any future WSDL
2.0 binding to be a separate binding element, that is, not just an
extension to the current binding.
-Eric.
