Mike,
I agree. The proposed resolution
simply renames and rewords the text to allow for the possibility of a different
callback binding, and describes specific behaviour when the forward and
callback binding are both JMS, but it does not describe or mandate any
behaviour when a different binding is used.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet -
Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB
05/03/2009 10:16
To
OASIS Bindings <>
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution
to issue BINDINGS-39
Folks,
I'm not sure that we should outlaw the idea that the callback could use
a different binding type
from that of the forward service.
However, I also would not require an SCA runtime to support such a configuration,
since it is going
to be mighty tricky to specify what callback metadata must be transmitted
with the forward call in
order to make the callback over a different binding. Equally, I don't
want us to get into the business
of trying to specify the metadata for these cases. Even the stuff
for callbacks over Web services is
proving more than tricky.
This might be a case of "optional support" for a runtime. Thus
it is mandatory to support callbacks
where the same binding type is used in both directions, but optional to
support callbacks where the
binding type is different for forward and callback operations.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email:
From:
Anish Karmarkar <>
To:
Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc:
OASIS Bindings <>
Date:
05/03/2009 01:48
Subject:
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution
to issue BINDINGS-39
Simon Holdsworth wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Here's my proposed resolution to issue BINDINGS-39, as updates to
cd02.
> Updates are in section 6.3 and 6.4 only.
>
>
>
> In making these changes I'm assuming that it is valid to have a
> different binding on the reference/service and the callback,
How would binding type-specific callback mechanisms work if the binding
type used in the forward direction is different from that used in the
callback direction?
-Anish
--
> and that
> this scenario can occur between SCA components as well as when
> interacting with external applications.
>
> Regards, Simon
>
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings
TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet -
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
