Re: [sca-bindings] Changing applied issues to closed - one issueleft

Hi Simon,

Simon Holdsworth wrote:

  Eric,
  

  

  My reading of the minutes was that
BINDINGS-17
was resolved by opening an issue against assembly including the
required
text.  The issue is ASSEMBLY-57, and the text does appear there.
  

Indeed, the minutes of March 4 & 5, 2008, show this as resolved....

  In terms of our process, this issue
cannot be applied, and I suppose that means it should be closed with no
action, as there is no bindings work required.  Not sure whether we
can imply CNA from the original resolution, or if we need a formal
motion
to do so.
  

For the clarity of the historical record of the TC, spending one to two
minutes to tie this one up with a bow might be a good idea.

-Eric.

  Regards, Simon
  

  

Simon Holdsworth

STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC
Chair

MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

Internet - 
  

  

  

  
    
      

        Eric
Johnson <>
        
        
13/03/2009 04:24
        

        
        
        
          
            

              
              
To

              
              "SCA >> OASIS
Bindings"
<>
              
            

            

              
              
cc

              
              

              
            

            

              
              
Subject

              
              [sca-bindings]
Changing applied issues
to closed - one issue left
            

          
        
        

        
          
            

              
              

              
              

              
            

          
        
        

        
      

    
  
  

  

  

  http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-17

  

Based on the JIRA changes Anish made, we apparently resolved that no

changes were needed for this particular issue, yet I didn't find any

such resolution in any of the meeting minutes that I looked at

immediately prior to the change done by Anish.

  

Nor has was this issue identified as being applied for the purposes of

any of our CD votes.

  

Perhaps someone else might be more successful finding the relevant

history for this issue?  What state should it be in?

  

Either that, or we should treat it as an unresolved issue, and vote on

close with no action.....

  

-Eric.

  

  

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
  

  

  
  

  

  
  

  

  
  

  

  
  
Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU