Re: [sca-bindings] Re: Proposed resolution to issue 54, attempt #4

Folks,

Comments:

1) Regarding the URI for a <service/>.

Points #1 and #4 refer to the structural
URI for a service.

I think that this needs clarifying at
least.  The Assembly spec makes it clear that  a structural URI
is a relative URI.

The way things are worded in this proposal
seems to imply that it is absolute.  It is certainly not clear how
the structural URI

becomes the absolute URI for a Web service.

2) Regarding the URI for a <reference/>

Point #3 says "use
the URI indicated by any contained wsdl:port element"

If there are multiple port elements,
each may have a different URI - is the runtime free to choose any one of
these?

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

From:
Eric Johnson <>

To:
OASIS Bindings <>

Date:
11/03/2009 22:02

Subject:
[sca-bindings] Re: Proposed resolution
to issue 54, attempt #4

Oops - forgot to incorporate comments from Mike E.

Attempt #4 attached.

-Eric.

Eric Johnson wrote:

> Attached.  Integrates all of Simon N.'s concerns, I think.

>

> -Eric.

>

> P.S. My apologies for missing the meeting today.  I forgot to
put an

> entry on my calendar for the unusual meeting, and it was all downhill

> from there.

>   

[attachment "sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02-issue54-proposal-04.doc"
deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU