Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [sca-bindings] Changing applied issues to closed - one issue left

From
Simon Holdsworth <>
Date
2009-03-16T10:29:43+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-bindings] Changing applied issues to closed - one issue left
Eric,

I've added this to Thursday's agenda.

Thanks, Simon

Simon Holdsworth

STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair

MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

Internet - 

Eric Johnson <>

13/03/2009 15:47

To

Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB

cc



Subject

Re: [sca-bindings] Changing applied
issues to closed - one issue left

Hi Simon,

Simon Holdsworth wrote: 

Eric, 

My reading of the minutes was that BINDINGS-17 was resolved by opening
an issue against assembly including the required text.  The issue
is ASSEMBLY-57, and the text does appear there. 

Indeed, the minutes of March 4 & 5, 2008, show this
as resolved....

In terms of our process, this issue cannot be applied, and I suppose that
means it should be closed with no action, as there is no bindings work
required.  Not sure whether we can imply CNA from the original resolution,
or if we need a formal motion to do so. 

For the clarity of the historical record of the TC, spending
one to two minutes to tie this one up with a bow might be a good idea.

-Eric.

Regards, Simon 

Simon Holdsworth

STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair

MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

Internet - 

Eric Johnson <>

13/03/2009 04:24

To

"SCA >> OASIS Bindings"
<>

cc

Subject

[sca-bindings] Changing applied issues
to closed - one issue left

http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-17

Based on the JIRA changes Anish made, we apparently resolved that no

changes were needed for this particular issue, yet I didn't find any

such resolution in any of the meeting minutes that I looked at

immediately prior to the change done by Anish.

Nor has was this issue identified as being applied for the purposes of

any of our CD votes.

Perhaps someone else might be more successful finding the relevant

history for this issue?  What state should it be in?

Either that, or we should treat it as an unresolved issue, and vote on

close with no action.....

-Eric.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Next in thread → Next in month →