Re: [sca-bindings] How to handle update history and JIRA for cd03

OK, I'll upload cd03 of JMS and JCA
today following this approach.

Regards, Simon

Simon Holdsworth

STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair

MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

Internet - 

David Booz <> wrote on 26/06/2009
13:01:39:

> (3) is what we do in Policy

> 

> Dave Booz

> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093

> e-mail:

> 

> [image removed] Simon Holdsworth ---06/26/2009 05:23:39 AM---Anish

> (and anyone else for comments), I'm trying to work out the best 

> approach for WS and JMS bindin

> 

> [image removed] 

> From:

> 

> [image removed] 

> Simon Holdsworth <>

> 

> [image removed] 

> To:

> 

> [image removed] 

> "OASIS Bindings" <>

> 

> [image removed] 

> Date:

> 

> [image removed] 

> 06/26/2009 05:23 AM

> 

> [image removed] 

> Subject:

> 

> [image removed] 

> [sca-bindings] How to handle update history and JIRA for cd03

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> Anish (and anyone else for comments), 

> 

> I'm trying to work out the best approach for WS and JMS bindings 

> documents in terms of how we handle the update history and links from
JIRA. 

> 

> I don't think its appropriate to have JIRA point to emails that 

> contain the documents with the issue applications, and we have to

> insert the applied issues into the document update history 

> somewhere, so I believe we have three possible approaches, would be

> good to agree on this before uploading cd03: 

> 

> 1) Upload the specific documents that were discussed on yesterday's

> call including the resolved issues in the update history in a new

> entry for that document, using their existing names, and point JIRA

> at those documents for those applied issues. Then upload cd03 based

> on those documents with just name change. 

> 2) Upload those documents using the next revision number including

> the resolved issues in the update history in a new entry for the new

> revision, and point JIRA at those documents for those applied 

> issues. Then upload cd03 based on those documents with just name change.

> 3) Upload cd03 including the resolved issues in the update history

> in a new entry for cd03, and point JIRA at cd03 for those applied
issues. 

> 

> Any preference? 3) is easiest, just don't know if its acceptable to

> have issues applied in a 'base' CD rather than a revision. 

> 

> Regards, Simon 

> 

> Simon Holdsworth

> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings
TC Chair

> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

> Internet -  

> 

> 

> 

> Unless stated otherwise above:

> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with

> number 741598. 

> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU 

> 

> 

> 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU