Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-111: binding.jms uses JMS URI schemewhich is not even an active IETF I-D

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-111

-Eric.

On 01/22/2010 10:43 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Description:
>
> The JMS URI scheme has once again gone stale.  Absent progress in moving
> this forward, it seems like the SCA Bindings TC perhaps should not rely
> on the former drafts for this URI scheme, since they are not officially
> sanctioned in any way.
>
> Proposals:
>
> Alternatives:
>
> A) Absent a standardized way of indicating JMS destinations, the
> interoperability of the entire JMS Binding is called into question. 
> Suggest dropping the JMS binding altogether
>
> B) The TC undertakes to develop an alternative to the existing JMS URI
> scheme.
>
>
>