NEW ISSUE: BWS40006's final clause is unnecessary

Title: BWS40006's final clause is unnecessary

Spec: WS Binding

Description:
BWS4006 says --
"When using the default transport binding rules, the SCA runtime MAY 
provide additional WSDL bindings, unless policy is applied that 
explicitly restricts this."

Why is the clause "... unless policy is applied that explicitly 
restricts this." necessary when this is a MAY? Why is this explicitly 
called out for only for the default binding rules. Isn't this true in 
the general case.

Proposal:

Convert BWS40006 to a sentence without the RFC2119 keyword: s/MAY/can/

-Anish
--