Re: [sca-bindings] JMS binding spec uploaded

For what it is worth, the latest version of OpenOffice seems to do an
OK job of comparing.  Accept the changes in the latest cd03-rev5.doc
file, then compare with the original cd03 file, and it will show you
all the changes.

-Eric.

On 03/18/2010 07:15 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote:

  Folks,
  

  

  I've uploaded an updated JMS binding
specification and corresponding TA document.
  

  

  The main updates in this revision
are
to fix the application of issue BINDINGS-108, and update the assembly
reference
to cd05.
  

  

  These changes cover all resolved
issues.
 I would request that this revision is reviewed by the TC members
as the candidate for cd04, and the second public review draft.
  

  

  Here are the JMS binding spec
documents:
  

  

  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36927/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-spec-cd03-rev5.doc
  

  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36928/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-spec-cd03-rev5.pdf
  

  

  And the TA documents.
  

  

  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36929/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd06.doc
  

  http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/36930/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd06.pdf
  

  

  The full list of applied issues, as
stated in the history of the document, and in JIRA is:
  

  

  BINDINGS-48
  

  BINDINGS-83
  

  BINDINGS-85
  

  BINDINGS-90
  

  BINDINGS-93
  

  BINDINGS-94
  

  BINDINGS-95
  

  BINDINGS-96
  

  BINDINGS-97
  

  BINDINGS-98
  

  BINDINGS-103
  

  BINDINGS-104
  

  BINDINGS-105
  

  BINDINGS-106
  

  BINDINGS-108
  

  BINDINGS-109
  

  BINDINGS-110
  

  

  I have prepared JCA binding spec and
TA documents for all resolved issues, but am waiting for BINDINGS-125
to
be opened and hopefully resolved and will then post the CD candidate
documents.
  

  

  I looked at the Word compare/merge
function,
but could not find any way to generate a document that effectively
consisted
of cd03 with all changes applied and marked.  The C&M function
results in a document that has all the text from both documents, with
indication
of deletions where the text differs.  So where an issue resulted in
text being deleted, the C&M document has the text present and
identified
as having been added in the original version, which I don't think
assists
reviewers at all.
  

  

  Regards, Simon
  

  

Simon Holdsworth

STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC
Chair,
AT&T and Boeing Lab Advocate

MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK

Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898

Internet - 

  
  

  

  
  

  

  
  
Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU