New issue: BJM30018 scope unclear

TARGET: SCA JMS Binding Specification cd04

TITLE: BJM30018 scope is unclear

DESCRIPTION: 

BJM30018 states:

When the connectionFactory element is present, then
the destination MUST be defined either by the destination element or the
@uri attribute

The connectionFactory element could be present directly
under the <binding.jms> element, or as a child of the <response>
element.  The existing statement applies when the connectionFactory
element is a child of the <binding.jms> element, in which case the
@uri makes sense as a place to define the destination.  However if
the connectionFactory is a child of the response element, then there are
two ways that the response destination can be specified - via the JMSReplyTo
header in the request message or via a destination element as a child of
the response element. 

PROPOSAL:

BJM60007 and BJM60008 already cover the behaviour
for responses, so I think that we just need to make BJM30018 specific to
the children of <binding.jms> as follows:

When the connectionFactory element is present as a
child of the binding.jms element the destination MUST be defined either
by a destination element child of the binding.jms element or by the @uri
attribute of the binding.jms element [BJM30018]

Simon Holdsworth

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU