Re: [sca-bindings] Updated JMS testcases document - a question of filenames

Folks,

I think that the use of file names containing
2 version numbers is bad and we should not do this:

sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-csd01-rev1

- what is anyone to make of the presence
of "1.1" alongside "1.0" ?

The SCA-J TC had an email exchange with
Robin Cover about the right form for filenames, and Robin's opinion is
that the

correct form is along these lines:

sca-j-pojo-ci-testcases-v1.1-csprd01.pdf

Note the presence of a single version
number that is clearly marked out with a "v" prefix.

As a result, I think that the Bindings
TC should adopt this naming for all future publication of documents - eg.

sca-jmsbinding-testcases-v1.1-csd01-rev1.pdf
     (etc)

Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards
 Mail Point 137, Hursley
Park

STSM
 Winchester, Hants SO21
2JN

SCA & Services
Standards
 United Kingdom

Co-Chair OASIS SCA
Assembly TC
 

IBM Software Group
  

Phone:
+44-1962 818014
  

Mobile:
+44-7802-467431 (274097)
  

e-mail:

  

 

 

From:
Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB

To:


Date:
28/03/2011 15:51

Subject:
[sca-bindings] Updated JMS testcases
document

Folks, 

I've uploaded an updated JMS testcases document with the issue resolutions
applied (BINDINGS-143, BINDINGS-147, BINDINGS-150)

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41634/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-csd01-rev1.odt

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41635/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-csd01-rev1.pdf

I used the document which resolved issue BINDINGS-147 as a basis.

One editorial modification to the issue resolutions - the public review
version of the testcase artefacts .ZIP file is currently located here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-bindings/TestCases-BJM-csd01.zip

so in this revision of the test cases document I have used this URL in
the related works section rather than the one which was named in the issue
resolution.  I believe when we upload the .ZIP archive for the next
public review, we should name it as follows: 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-bindings/sca-jmsbinding-1.1-testcases-1.0-csd02.zip

Although I'm not clear on whether we should have the "-1.0" in
there, which is currently in the name of the test cases specification document
but was not in the proposal to resolve issue 150. 

I should note that the WS binding testcases .zip file which was publicly
reviewed is located at : 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-bindings/sca-wsbinding-1.1-testcases-cd01.zip

which has the correct naming structure, without the "-1.0" suffix
to "testcases", consistent with the naming of the WS binding
testcases specification document.  If we decide to remove the "-1.0"
from the JMS testcases zip file we also should do that from the testcase
specification document.  The unfortunate situation though is that
the "latest" link for the JMS testcases DOES include "-1.0"....
and as per previous discussions this may be immutable.

Regards, Simon 

Simon Holdsworth

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU