← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[BINDINGS-161]: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is thatappropriate?

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2011-05-12T10:28:06+00:00
ID
Thread
[BINDINGS-161]: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is thatappropriate?
Folks,

I'm in favour of removing this as a
normative statement.  I also note that the same issue applies both

to BWS50014 and BWS50015 so I think
that this issue should deal with both of them.

So my proposal is as follows:

Replace the normative statements [BWS50014]
and [BWS50015] with the following text:

"It is good practice for Policies
and Assertions to be signed to prevent tampering.  It is acceptable
for

an SCA runtime to reject a Policy that
is not signed or where there is no associated security token

which indicates that the signer has
appropriate claims for the policy."

Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards
 Mail Point 137, Hursley
Park

STSM
 Winchester, Hants SO21
2JN

SCA & Services
Standards
 United Kingdom

Co-Chair OASIS SCA
Assembly TC
 

IBM Software Group
  

Phone:
+44-1962 818014
  

Mobile:
+44-7802-467431 (274097)
  

e-mail:

  

 

 

From:
Anish Karmarkar <>

To:
OASIS Bindings <>

Date:
12/05/2011 05:58

Subject:
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BWS50015's
target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?

Title: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document,
is that appropriate?

Spec: sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04

Description:

BWS50015 states --

Policies and assertions SHOULD be signed to prevent tampering. [BWS50014]

We haven't defined WSDL 1.1 as a conformance target. Furthermore, 

policies can be inlined in a WSDL document or referenced.

Proposal:

We could go one of two ways, we could define WSDL 1.1 as a target

OR

we could refactor this to state that policy assertions ought to be 

signed without using RFC2119 keywords, and add a requirement that says

that for a SCA WS Binding XML document to be conformant any policy 

referenced (directly or indirectly) SHOULD be signed.

OR

we could just remove the SHOULD altogether and just talk about this 

without 2119 keywords.

-Anish

--

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →