Re: [sca-bindings] [BINDINGS-164] WS binding RPC literal supportshould require specific namespace

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-164

    

    -Eric.

    

    On 6/7/11 4:17 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote:
    
      
      Target:
         sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf
      

      

      Description: 
      

      

      BWS40007 is currently a SHOULD:
      

      

      When using the default transport binding rules with
        the
        rpc-literal pattern, the SCA runtime SHOULD use the structural
        URI associated
        with the binding as the namespace of the child elements of the
        SOAP body
        element
      

      

      Which implies this is an optional
        feature
        of the WS binding spec.  In the interest of simplifying the
        conformance
        requirements for the binding we ought to consider whether this
        really needs
        to be optional.   The behaviour described by the statement is
        necessary
        for correct interoperation, and nothing is gained by using some
        other namespace
        for the child elements of the SOAP body element,
      

      

      Proposal:
      

      

      Strengthen this statement to a
        MUST.
      

      Either update the test case
        document
        to state that this TA is mandatory and not tested, or mandatory
        and create
        a new testcase.
      

      

      ---------------------------------
      

      

        Simon Holdsworth

      
      

      

      
      

        

        
      
Unless stated otherwise
            above:

            IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
            with number
            741598. 

            Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
            Hampshire PO6
            3AU