← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[NEW ISSUE] BWS50014 & BWS50015 are optional normative statements

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2011-06-08T12:40:11+00:00
ID
Thread
[NEW ISSUE] BWS50014 & BWS50015 are optional normative statements
Target:  sca-wsbinding-1.1-cd04.pdf

Description: 

BWS50014 & BWS50015 are both optional
normative statements - this gives problems in meeting the exit requirements
and are not acceptable:

[BWS50014]
Policies and assertions SHOULD be signed
to prevent tampering.

[BWS50015]
Policies SHOULD NOT be accepted unless they
are signed and have an associated security token to specify the signer
has proper claims for the given policy.

Proposal:

Make both statements non-normative,
replacing them with the following text:

"It is good practice for Policies
and assertions to be signed to prevent tampering.  

It is advisable that an SCA runtime
does not accept Policies unless they are signed and have an 

associated security token to specify
the signer has proper claims for the given policy."

Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards
 Mail Point 137, Hursley
Park

STSM
 Winchester, Hants SO21
2JN

SCA & Services
Standards
 United Kingdom

Co-Chair OASIS SCA
Assembly TC
 

IBM Software Group
  

Phone:
+44-1962 818014
  

Mobile:
+44-7802-467431 (274097)
  

e-mail:

  

 

 

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →