Re: [sca-bindings] [Comment] Web Services Binding specification -optional conformance points

On 6/2/2011 9:10 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Somehow I think that we have overlooked the Web Services binding spec
> when considering optional normative statements.
>
> So this email is intended to kick start the discussion, which will lead
> to some issues, I think.
>
> The following is a list of optional normative statements in
> sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04.doc:
>
> BWS20022 (see also BWS20023)
> BWS20029
> BWS20030
> BWS20034
> BWS20036
> BWS40007
> BWS50014
> BWS50015
>
> There are also the Section 6 Conformance items to consider:
>
> Section 6.4 Item 2
> Section 6.4 Item 3
>
> Plus the whole question of WSCB support
> - do we have 2 implementations? - if not we have to split the spec :-(
>

Splitting has been my preferred solution all along :-)
It does not hold up progress on the main spec and becomes a much more 
friendly/accessible/composable WS-* spec.

-Anish
--