Re: [sca-bindings] Comments on WS bindings issues 1, 3, 4

Further to my comment on https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCABINDINGS-1,
 the normative statement covering this is:

[ASM50026] If a reference has a value
specified for one or more target services in its @target attribute, there
MUST NOT be any child <binding/> elements declared for that reference.

Regards, Simon

<> wrote
on 04/04/2013 12:45:25:

> From: Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB

> To: , 

> Date: 04/04/2013 12:45

> Subject: [sca-bindings] Comments on WS bindings
issues 1, 3, 4

> Sent by: <>

> 

> Folks, 

> 

> Some comments on the recent bindings issues: 

> 

> https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCABINDINGS-1

> 

> TEST_BWS_2002.composite specifies both @target and binding 

> 

> The latest version of the file can be seen at: 

> 

> http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/sca-

> bindings/TestCases_BWS/BWS_2002/src/main/resources/Test_BWS_2002.composite

> 

> This test is actually to check if the <binding> element's 

> @wsdlElement attribute points to a valid WSDL element. 

> 

> Assembly spec (csprd04.pdf line 392) states " If the @target

> attribute is set, the reference cannot also have binding subelements."

> 

> Given that, the test requires a <binding> element, and therefore
the

> reference should not have a @target attribute. 

> This change would not affect the outcome of the test, but could 

> change the reason for an implementation passing this test. 

> 

> Therefore I agree that we should make the proposed change. 

> 

> https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCABINDINGS-3

> 

> Typo in BWS_2011 <soap:address location="&amp;ws_addr_2010;"></soap:address>

> 

> The latest version of the file can be seen at: 

> 

> http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/sca-

> bindings/TestCases_BWS/BWS_2011/src/main/resources/Service1InvalidService.wsdl

> 

> This test validates the WSDL binding referred to from a <binding>

> element's @wsdlElement attribute. As such the endpoint address in

> the WSDL port element is not relevant to the test and could have any

> syntactically valid value.  The value present has the same syntax

> that is used for replaceable endpoint URLs, and by convention that

> ought to be &amp;ws_add_2011; to match the test case, however
that 

> variable is not needed or set for this testcase, so technically this

> is not an error, but it does look odd. 

> 

> The simple answer is to change the text to "2011" but this
change 

> should not affect the outcome of any execution of the testcase. 

> 

> https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SCABINDINGS-4

> 

> Typo in BWS_2018 composite 

> 

> The latest version of the file can be seen at: 

> 

> http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/sca-

> bindings/TestCases_BWS/BWS_2018/src/main/resources/Test_BWS_2018.composite

> 

> The "TestClient" component is defined with a property: 

> <property name="testName">ASM_2018</property>

> 

> This is clearly incorrect as the test is BWS_2018.  However this

> test is a negative test with invalid SCDL syntax, which means that

> error is caught before the test client is executed, so the test name

> attribute (and indeed the test client component) are irrelevant to

> the test.  Changing this should not affect the outcome of any

> execution of this test case, but this ought to be fixed if we have

> the opportunity. 

> 

> Regards, Simon

> 

> Unless stated otherwise above:

> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with

> number 741598. 

> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU