← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: raw minutes 11/01

From
Durand, Jacques R. <>
Date
2007-11-06T01:13:33+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: raw minutes 11/01
Slightly edited 
minutes of 2007/11/01

 

- please note 3 
new action items, given IDs:  #0016, #0017, #0018

- added meta data 
stuff at beginning (e.g. meting metadata, URL of email announcing agenda) to 
comply with expected structure.

- other minor fixes 
to scribing conventions the xslt will need.

- let me know if I 
missed some attendees.

 

Jacques

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

jacques: meeting: weekly SCA BPEL conference 
call

jacques: date: 2007-11-01

jacques: scribe: jacques

jacques: agenda: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200711/msg00010.html

jacques: Anish: did update to agenda

jacques: attendees 
are: 

Michael 
Pellegrini  	Active Endpoints, Inc.
Michael Rowley 	BEA Systems, 
Inc.
Jacques Durand 	Fujitsu Limited*
Mike Edwards 	IBM 	
Martin 
Chapman 	Oracle Corporation
Anish Karmarkar 	Oracle Corporation
Ashok 
Malhotra 	Oracle Corporation
Jeff Mischkinsky 	Oracle Corporation
Alex Yiu 
	Oracle Corporation
Sanjay Patil 	SAP AG*
Danny van der Rijn 	TIBCO 
Software Inc.

Najeeb 
Andrabi  TIBCO Software Inc.

Sanjay: Anish, I have to step out and I will be on 
the road for the next 30 mins. Just fyi.

anish: 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/event.php?event_id=16226&day=1193911200

jacques: topic: agenda item 4

jacques: anish: no formatted minute yet, asked Bob 
for processor

jacques: sanjay: Bob should do it end of this week, 
not yet

jacques: anish: we have raw minutes Oct 11, Oct 18, 
Oct 25, should be able to approve that

jacques: jeff: move we approve raw minutes of Oct 
11-to-25

jacques: mike R: seconded

jacques: sanjay: technically we can't upload them 
before formatted

jacques: resolution: motion passed unanimously (raw 
format acceptable)

jacques: action: id=0010 owner=MikeEdwards 
status=pending

jacques: anish: about informing other TCs thats a 
change in process

jacques: anish: few weeks ago, made changes in 
possible status - resolved to apply in normal case

jacques: s/apply/applied

jacques: anish: still pending AI

jacques: action: id=0011 owner=NajeebAndrabi 
statu=closed

jacques: anish: closed

jacques: topic: Nominate representative to the 
Inter-SCA Liaison Committee

jacques: sanjay: did send an email on this (subject 
line on Policy) sent to member section public list

jacques: topic: New issues

jacques: topic: 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-13

jacques: anish: (email : issue 2) proposed 
suggestion as in email.

jacques: anish: do we approve this new issue? 

jacques: Mike E: motion to approve issue 
13

jacques: Mike R: second

jacques: resolution: motion accepted

jacques: topic: 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-14

jacques: anish: thought it requires an issue on its 
own - should be able to do that in BPEL process

jacques: Mike E: if you wish you can annotate BPEL 
process, in Java, added an issue for this

jacques: Mike E: this issue here is about same 
thing.

jacques: anish: we can alway s close with no action 
later

jacques: Mike E: I move to accept 
issue

jacques: Jeff: seconded

jacques: resolution: motion accepted

jacques: topic: 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-5

jacques: Danny: have not been up to date on this to 
discuss it yet

jacques: anish: we need to discuss this on this 
call - important

anish: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200710/msg00022.html

jacques: Mike R: proposed to close with no 
action

jacques: ... a spec making normative statement is 
confusing: forward ref on static analysis of context

jacques: s/of context/of process

jacques: anish: need editorial tweaks, otherwise 
there is agreement - to be fixed by email (Danny?)

jacques: danny: will have time to help on 
this

jacques: mike R: not sure what can be done - need 
to clarify

jacques: danny: can take this action 
item

anish: action: id=0016 owner=danny 
status=open

jacques: action item #0016: Danny to come back with 
a rewording proposal for issue-5

jacques: topic: 
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-11

jacques: anish: no email discussion on 
this

jacques: issue about BPEL variable initialisation. 
Precedence issue.

jacques: ... similar issue in Java

anish: DESCRIPTION: Is the target variable allowed 
to have an initialization

defined within the BPEL process and if so, is this 
initialization ignored?

It seems like the initialization should be allowed 
but not executed in the

case where a process is packaged as an SCA and the 
property is provided by

the component. It's probably also worth pointing 
out that the variable must

be an element or type variable. Message variables 
cannot be initialized by

an SCA property.

jacques: mike R: cannot use kword MUST in this case 
- 

jacques: anish: sufficient to say "this MUST NOT 
happen" (error generation is not mandated)

jacques: Sanjay: all depends if it make sense to 
initialise mesg properties

jacques: mike R: issue is about allowing people to 
generate error

jacques: mike P: agree with Mike R. 

jacques: alex: Agree to use term MUST in this 
case

jacques: najeeb: an issue only for the inbound. If 
outbound, can initialise at SCA level.

jacques: najeeb: out variable, if SCA property then 
we have a valid case

jacques: mike R: inching to consensus on this 
point: shouldnot be allowed for message vars

jacques: mike R: second point more tricky - deafult 
values

anish: action: id=0017 owner= MikeP 
status=open

jacques: action item #0017 is for MikeP to propose 
a sentence for resolving the 2nd part of issue 11

jacques: ... point is: component type knows it has 
default value – rather not trying to define override. If SCArop = yes, 
initialisation defines default value

Michael Rowley: If a variable with sca 
property="yes" had an initialization expression, than that expression is treated 
as the default value of the SCA property.

anish: s/had/has/

Danny van der Rijn: s/than/then 

jacques: anish: question: if default val does not 
show up in component type, what teh pint?

jacques: mike R: still useful: does not need to be 
set

jacques: s/teh pint/the point

jacques: mike R: may need introduce concept 
optional property , not default value - affect assembly spec

jacques: anish: asign an action to someone 

jacques: 
anish: it is not a fixed value

jacques: 
anish: that can be used in the componentType

Mike Pellegrini1: A BPEL variable which is marked 
with an sca property="yes" must be either an XML Schema Type or an XML Schema 
Element type variable. This is directly related to the assembly spec which 
states a property is one of type or element.

jacques: anish: mike R will sent response to issue 
11

anish: action: id=0018 owner=MikeR 
status=open

jacques: action item #0018 is for MikeR to follow 
up on the 1st part of issue 11 on email

anish thanks Jacques for taking 
minutes</B

jacques: resolution: motion to adjourn from Anish, 
approved unanimously.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →