Re: [sca-bpel] Assembly issue 54 (interface.partnerLinkType) wasCNAed

Title: Re: [sca-bpel] Assembly issue 54 (interface.partnerLinkType)
was CNAed

I have had internal discussions that have set me straight.  I now agree
with your approach.

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
" type="cite">
  
  
  

  
I see it differently.

Assembly defines interface.wsdl, all other interface types are defined

else where. Currently in SCA we only have interface.java and

interface.wsdl. interface.java is defined in the java specs not in the

assembly spec.

  

If we were to create a interface.partnerlinkType spec, we can ask the

assembly spec to add examples containing interface.partnerlinkType. This

is how interface.java is structured right now.

  

-Anish

--

  

Danny van der Rijn wrote:

> If it's not in assembly, it doesn't do us much good to have it.

>

> Anish Karmarkar wrote:

>>

>> At the recent Assembly f2f meeting, assembly issue 54

>> (http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-54)
was closed-with-no-action.

>>

>> So this issue comes back to us. Do we want to create a
standalone spec

>> (independent of BPEL C&I) for interface.partnerlinkType ?

>>

>> -Anish

>> --

>>

>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------

>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS
TC that

>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in
OASIS at:

>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

>>

  
  

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature