← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

NEW ISSUE: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021

From
Patil, Sanjay <>
Date
2009-04-09T00:27:27+00:00
ID
Thread
NEW ISSUE: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021
Title: NEW ISSUE: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021

Title: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021

Target: SCA BPEL spec

Description:

The RFC 2119 guideline for using the word 'MAY' is:

This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is

truly optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a

particular marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that

it enhances the product while another vendor may omit the same item. 

SBPEL3021 reads as: An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires MAY be used to declare required policy intents on a partner link. 

The word 'MAY' in this statement is intended to point out a feature that is available for users of the products implementing the specification and is not intended to point out the optionality from a vendor implementation point of view.

Proposal:

Change SBPEL3021 to read as:

An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires is used to declare required policy intents on a partner link.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →