Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 35: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021

This is now issue 35
http://osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-35

Patil, Sanjay wrote:
> 
> Title: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021
> 
> Target: SCA BPEL spec
> 
> Description:
> The RFC 2119 guideline for using the word 'MAY' is:
> This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is
> truly optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a
> particular marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that
> it enhances the product while another vendor may omit the same item.
> SBPEL3021 reads as: An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires MAY be 
> used to declare required policy intents on a partner link.
> 
> The word 'MAY' in this statement is intended to point out a feature that 
> is available for users of the products implementing the specification 
> and is not intended to point out the optionality from a vendor 
> implementation point of view.
> 
> Proposal:
> Change SBPEL3021 to read as:
> An SCA extension attribute sca-bpel:requires is used to declare required 
> policy intents on a partner link.
>