Bryan,
There has only been brief mention that such a change might be needed or
desirable. There is no sca-j issue open for this. It is potentially
related (but not tied) to what decisions are made about XML namespaces. My
own view is that we should not change the package names unless the sca-j
TC changes the APIs in an incompatible way.
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
Bryan Aupperle <>
13/12/2007 17:11
To
cc
Subject
[sca-j] package names
I know that this is a minor thing, but has there been any discussion about
needing to change the package names from org.osoa.sca... to something else
- potentially org.oasis.sca... or org.oasis-open.sca...?
Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Research Triangle Park, NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address:
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
