Folks,
I argue (and did argue on the TC call
!) that the meaning of :
"...a setter method....typed by
the service interface..."
- is pretty clear.
In general, a setter method simply sets
something - and the only "type" that is relevant to
a setter method is the type of its parameter
- I can think of no other meaning for it. There
seems no need to spell it out.
The updated text makes it clear that
the @Reference annotation is applied to the method
not to the parameter.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email:
Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
28/04/2008 12:09
To
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on
setter method parameter or the method itself?
Vamsi,
JAVA-33 is resolved. Please see the minutes of the sca-j call of
April 3. The proposed wording change in the JIRA was adopted. The
point you are making was raised (by myself!) when the TC discussed the
motion to resolve the issue. Other TC members felt that the proposed
wording was sufficiently clear, so I did not press this to a vote. Are
you OK with the wording that was adopted, or do you want to reopen the
issue with a proposal to change the wording?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
C Vamsi <>
28/04/2008 05:05
To
Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on
setter method parameter or the method itself?
Hi Simon,
Thank you for pointing to JAVA-33. I failed to locate that issue
since
"Java Common Annotations and APIs specification" is not marked
as the
component affected by this issue. I don't think JAVA-33 is resolved
yet as
I notice that the text in section 2.1.4 of v1.1 draft does not reflect
the
resolution and even the status at http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-33
is still shown as "New". Though the current proposal for
JAVA-33 changes
"setter method parameter" to "setter method", it is
not the setter method
but the parameter to the setter method that is typed by the service
interface. I am alright if my proposed resolution gets considered
under
JAVA-33 itself.
++Vamsi
Simon Nash
<>
To
28/04/2008 03:00
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j]
@Reference annotation
on setter
method parameter or the
method itself?
Vamsi,
This appears to be a duplicate of JAVA-33. Were you intending to
reopen
that issue (which would require a 2/3 majority), or are you OK with the
change made to this text by the resolution to JAVA-33?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
C Vamsi
<>
To
26/04/2008 09:51
cc
Subject
[sca-j] @Reference annotation
on setter method parameter or
the method itself?
DESCRIPTION:
Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification v1.00 - Sec 1.2.2 - Lines
245 to 246:
245 Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a
field, a setter method parameter, or a
246 constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated
with
an @Reference annotation.
From the above it could be interpreted that the parameter to the setter
method can be annotated with @Reference whereas section 1.8.14 does not
talk about or give an example where a parameter to the setter method is
annotated with @Reference, but mentions that the setter method itself (not
the input parameter) should be annotated with @Reference.
PROPOSAL: Change lines 245 and 246 to read the following:
Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a field,
a setter method with input parameter typed by the service interface, or
a
constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated with
an
@Reference annotation.
++Vamsi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
