← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

ISSUE-77: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generallyaccepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

From
David Booz <>
Date
2008-09-17T14:23:32+00:00
ID
Thread
ISSUE-77: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generallyaccepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-77

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093

e-mail:

"Pradeep Simha" <>

"Pradeep Simha" <> 

09/15/2008 09:02 PM

To

<>

cc

Subject

[sca-j] NEW ISSUE: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0

TARGET: Java Common Annotations and APIs, WD 04, section 8.16

 

DESCRIPTION: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 

 

On lines 1556-1557, the sentence “A remotable service can be published externally as a service and must be translatable into a WSDL portType" implies support for WSDL 1.1 only.

 

PROPOSAL:

 

Replace the text with the following:

 

A remotable service can be published externally as a service and SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →