I have another editorial change for rev4. I had actually started a rev4 but never published it and forgot about that fact until now....the only difference between what I had done and this rev is the following (which was based on an email comment from Vamsi):
Section 1.2 added:
[JAVABEANS] JavaBeans 1.01 Specification, http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/api/
Section 8.14 modified:
name (optional) – the name of the property. For a field annotation, the default is the name of the field of the Java class. For a setter method annotation, the default is the JavaBeans [JAVABEANS] property name corresponding to the setter method name. For a constructor parameter annotation, there is no default and the name attribute MUST be present.
The change was to use the [JAVABEANS] reference declared in 1.2.
Consider this a suggestion.
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:
Simon Nash ---01/19/2009 10:19:31 AM---There is another small typo in the same paragraph on line 207. The cross-reference is given as [JAXB
From:
Simon Nash <>
To:
OASIS Java <>
Date:
01/19/2009 10:19 AM
Subject:
Re: [sca-j] Candidate CD02 (CD01-rev4) ready
There is another small typo in the same paragraph on line 207.
The cross-reference is given as [JAXB] but it should be [JAX-B].
Simon
Simon Nash wrote:
> I reviewed the changes in this draft and found a problem. The
> incorporation of text to apply the resolution of issue 101 has
> reversed the resolution of issue 79. I believe this was accidental
> and not intended.
>
> The problem is in line 205 of the PDF version of cd01-rev4. Prior
> to cd01-rev3, this text read "...arguments and return values...".
> In cd01-rev3, the application of the resolution of issue 79 changed
> this to "...parameters and return types...". In cd01-rev4, this
> text has been changed back to "...arguments and return values...",
> thus reversing the resolution of issue 79.
>
> Before rev4 is published as the next CD, this text should be
> reverted to what was agreed in the resolution of issue 79.
>
> Simon
>
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>> Located at:
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/30736/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4.pdf
>>
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/30735/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev4.doc
>>
>>
>> I have used rev3 as the basis, accepted all the changes, and applied
>> resolutions for all the issues in JIRA that had a status of
>> 'Resolved'; namely: 28, 52, 94, 96, 99, 101. JIRA has been updated
>> with the status of 'Applied' and a pointer to rev4 in comments.
>>
>> This also fulfills some of the AIs that I had.
>>
>> -Anish
>> --
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
