Re: [sca-j] JAVA-153: Proposed resolution rev3

David Booz wrote:
> one comment below
> 
> (cut)
 >
>  > >
>  > > I'm merely pointing out that ISSUE-125 is still not completely correct.
>  > >
>  > This small clarification to existing text was overlooked when we resolved
>  > JAVA-125.  This language is non-normative and I would have thought that
>  > the change could be handled editorially.  If as chair you think that a
>  > formal resolution is needed to add these few words of clarification, 
> I will
>  > propose reopening JAVA-125 so that these words can we added to the 
> sentence
>  > in chapter 3.
> 
> Formality takes more work but it ensures that everyone is aware of
> important changes in the document.  I think we need an issue for this (or
> re-opening 125).
> 
I'm happy to follow this procedure, and I have sent an email requesting
that JAVA-125 be reopened.

   Simon