Simon,
I had not gone in for the enforcement
of the one arg constructor in the vendor ClientFactory classes, although
the default FactoryFinder assumed its
presence:
Constructor<? extends
SCAClientFactory> URIConstructor =
factoryImplClass.getConstructor(domainURI.getClass());
I can buy the argument for enforcement
in the way you suggest and add the required constructor methods
to SCAClientFactory.
What is the argument for the protected
getDomainURI() method on SCAClientFactory? I can more easily see
the argument
for a public version of such a method,
although it did not seem essential, which is why I left it out (to keep
it as simple as possible)
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email:
Simon Nash <> wrote on 25/06/2009
11:31:24:
> Mike Edwards wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I've done a pass at implementing Simon's thoughts in spec form
here:
> >
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/
> 33076/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3%20Issue1%20rev%207.doc
> >
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/
> 33077/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3%20Issue1%20rev%207.pdf
> >
> I took a quick look through this and I don't see anything to support
> the following requirement from my previous email about this:
>
> To make this work in the VendorA/VendorB situation that we have
> been discussing, it would be necessary to also do one of the
> following:
> a) add additional methods setDomainURI() and getDomainURI()
to
> the SCAClientFactory abstract class
> b) require every factory to have a one-argument constructor
that
> takes the domain URI as an argument. This
could be enforced by
> putting a private no-argument constructor and
a protected
> one-argument contructor on the SCAClientFactory
abstract class,
> together with a protected concrete getDomainURI()
method that
> returns the domain URI.
> Of these two options, my preference is for b).
>
> Please refer to my previous email for more detail on why this
> is needed.
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
