Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2009-06-29T10:44:26+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
Folks,

I'm still deeply unconvinced as to the
use of the function contained in this resolution.

I'll vote for "Close no action"
on this issue.

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

From:
Simon Nash <>

To:
OASIS Java <>

Date:
29/06/2009 11:10

Subject:
[sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution

I am attaching updated JavaCAA and JavaCI documents
containing

a proposed resolution to JAVA-139.

   Simon

[attachment "sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd03+issue139.doc" deleted
by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] [attachment "sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01+issue139.doc"
deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU