← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Normative statement JCA90052 is poorly worded - [JAVA-165]
Hi, I have raised this new issue as JAVA-165. See: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-165 Thanks, Mark Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | From: Mike Edwards [mailto:] Sent: 15 June 2009 08:32 To: OASIS Java Subject: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Normative statement JCA90052 is poorly worded Raiser: Mike Edwards Target: sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd03.pdf Description: JCA90052 is worded as follows: The @AllowsPassByReference annotation MAY be placed on an individual method of a remotable service implementation, on a service implementation class, or on an individual reference for a remotable service. When applied to a reference, it MAY appear anywhere that the @Remotable annotation MAY appear. It MUST NOT appear anywhere else. The existence of three MAY words followed by a MUST NOT is at best confusing. It leads to an assumption that @AllowsPassByReference is an optional feature, which is not intended. This confusing formulation should be replaced by clearer wording that avoids the impression of optionality. Proposal: The @AllowsPassByReference annotation MUST only annotate the following locations: - a service implementation class - an individual method of a remotable service implementation - an individual reference which uses a remotable interface, where the @AllowsPassByReference annotation can annotate any artifact which can be annotated by the @Remotable annotation [JCA90052] Yours, Mike. Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO. Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC. IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain. Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431 Email: Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →